|
The Challenge
of Gender Bias in the IT Industry
Peter Bednar & Andy Bissett,
School of Computing & Management Sciences,
Sheffield Hallam University,
England
S1 1WB
a.bissett@shu.ac.uk
Abstract
There
seems to be no obvious reason why a gender imbalance should exist,
yet this phenomenon is evident to all who work in and around the
Information Technology field. From training and education through
to practitioners, managers, and academia, women are in a significant
minority, and tend to receive lower remuneration on average than
their male colleagues (Panteli et al, 1998).
IT and its associated
industries have become a highly significant contribution to economies
around the world. Everywhere predictions are being made that IT
will provide the catalyst for new economic growth which will revitalise
older industries and that new and unimagined synergies will emerge.
Internationally there is an ever growing advocacy of emerging technologies
and changes in organisations which in combination with globalisation,
environmental and ecological issues are viewed as having major economic
impact in the new global community (Giddens, 2000).Yet the gender
imbalance so evident in many sectors of public and economic life
is replicating itself even in the new 'sunrise' industry. Doubtless
this gendered compartmentalisation is in part a reflection of wider
(male biased) social and technological issues; perhaps it is exactly
because IT has been accorded such significance that women are not
equally represented in these high-earning 'plum' roles. It is a
striking contradiction that a field to which women have made such
notable contributions (Leeming, 1996), and whose sole requirement
is human brain-power, should so little reflect the abilities of
50% of its potential workforce and end users.
We begin with
some brief empirical observations to illustrate the gender imbalance.
A typical entry point into the industry is examined - the education
process; subsequent sections highlight the gender imbalance within
the industry, in terms of a large UK bank (Lauener, 1999), and in
terms of membership of professional bodies (Prior et al, 1999).
We go on to
ask: what are the effects within the industry of this imbalance?
If women are under-represented in the IT industry, then many aspects
of the industry will be subtly influenced. There is some evidence,
for instance, that the ethical outlooks of male and female IT professionals
differ (Bissett & Shipton, 1999). A second outcome to be influenced
concerns the nature of the artefacts themselves that are produced
by this far-reaching industry. If these are produced in a certain
way by a certain kind of person, what are the effects for those
of us who are not included within that specific social alignment
(Green et al, 1993)?
There seems
to be very little evidence that equal opportunity programs have
had the wanted impact. However, as Giddens (1984, 1991) suggests
it is still possible and meaningful to create and design a future
life space with the aim of solving different social and cultural
problems. No doubt if the industry could make itself more attractive
to women, then more women would wish to study computing. But this
is not the only problem: another main dimension has to do with 'gender
ignorant' theories and practices. A naive understanding of information
systems, organisational theories and practices might inhibit a more
adequate and progressive understanding of the gender dimension.
Worse still, the issue of how innovation is introduced (in this
most innovative of fields) is suggested to have an impact on the
degree to which it causes unequal consequences (e.g. Rogers, 1995,
p.435).
The IS discussion
needs to take into consideration and support a greater awareness
of gender issues and their potential organisational and social implications.
When engaging in efforts to help individuals to combine their (work
and family) roles to advance organisational change and benefits,
gender strategies become increasingly important (e.g. Haas et. al.
2000). Also, given that IS research practice has often treated gender
issues as being either non-existent or non-relevant in the IS arena,
there is a need to expand our field to include gender strategy.
Some ways forward such as Contextual Analysis (Bednar, 2000) are
briefly outlined.
Finally, research
about unequal distribution of power might start out with general
power issues that apply to women and men alike (although any serious
study of unequal power distribution would call for a look into possible
gender issues). Several of the arguments put forward in this paper
would also be valid for effects of unequal power distribution in
general. This would include unequal power distribution in such a
context as the development and use of IT artefacts for socially
distinct groups, e.g. between young versus older people, blind or
deaf persons, and so forth.
References
Bednar P. M. (2000). A Contextual Integration of Individual and
Organizational Learning Perspectives as Part of IS Analysis. Journal
of Informing Science. p145 - 156. Volume 3 No 3.
Bissett A. &
Shipton G. (1999). An Investigation Into Gender Differences in the
Ethical Attitudes of IT Professionals, in J. van den Hoven, S. Rogerson,
T. Ward Bynum, D. Gotterbarn (eds) Proceedings ETHICOMP'99,
LUISS Guido Carli, Rome, October 1999. CD-ROM ISBN 88-900396-0-4.
Giddens A. (1984).
The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens A. (1991).
Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern
age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giddens A. (2000).
The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Green E., Owen
J. and Pain D., eds. (1993). Gendered by design? : information technology
and office systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
Haas L. L.,
Hwang P. & Russel G. ed. (2000). Organizational Change & Gender
Equity: International Perspectives on Fathers and Mothers at the
Workplace. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lauener A. (1999).
Survey of the use of a System Development Method at a large UK bank,
Sheffield Hallam University, October 1999.
Leeming, A.
(1996). The contribution of women to computing, in Barroso, P.,
Ward BynumT., Rogerson S., and Joyanes L. (eds.) Proceedings ETHICOMP
96, Vol. 1, Complutense University of Madrid, 122-140.
Panteli A.,
Stack J., Atkinson M., & Ramsay H. (1998). Women in computing: the
ethical responsibility of the IT industry, in J. van den Hoven,
S. Rogerson, T. Ward Bynum, D. Gotterbarn (eds) Proceedings ETHICOMP'98,
Erasmus University Rotterdam, March 1998. 535-546.
Prior M., Rogerson
S., Fairweather N.B., Butler L., Dixon S. (1999). Is IT Ethical?
Sidcup UK: Institute for the Management of Information Systems.
Rogers E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4:th ed. New York:
The Free Press.
Back
to Accepted Papers
Back to Top
|