|
In the current “Age of Information”, the field of
Information Ethics is becoming vital to the preservation and
advancement of human values, the understanding of human
relationships and communities, the ethical development and
control of new technologies, and the fostering of respect and
cooperation among many diverse cultures and societies across
the globe. The time is right, therefore, for rapid
development and advancement in Information Ethics – a
broad new field of research about ethical issues arising from
the creation, transmission, storage and processing of
information. Subfields of Information ethics include vital
areas like Computer Ethics, Internet Ethics, Agent Ethics,
Journalism Ethics, Library Ethics, the Ethics of Genetic
Engineering, the Ethics of Nanotechnology, and others.
An important prerequisite for the advancement of
Information Ethics is the provision of a
philosophical/metaphysical foundation. Happily, major steps
in the development of such a foundation were taken decades
ago by Norbert Wiener in his books Cybernetics (1948),
The Human Use of Human Beings (1950, 1954) and God
and Golem, Inc. (1964). In addition, beginning in the
late 1990s, Luciano Floridi (with some of his colleagues at
Oxford University) initiated a rigorous and ambitious program
to advance the field of Information Ethics. The present paper
briefly explores (1) Wiener’s metaphysical foundation for
Information Ethics, (2) some contemporary developments in
astrophysics which reinforce Wiener’s achievements, and (3)
an alternative metaphysical foundation offered by Floridi and
his Information Ethics Research Group at Oxford University.
Wiener’s metaphysics assumed that information is
physical – subject to the laws of nature and measurable
by science. The sort of information Wiener had in mind is
sometimes called ‘Shannon information’ – named for Claude
Shannon, who had been a student and colleague of Wiener’s at
MIT. Shannon information is carried in telephone wires, TV
cables and radio signals. It is the kind of information that
digital computers process and DNA encodes within the cells of
all biological organisms. Wiener believed that such
information, even though it is physical, is neither matter
nor energy. Thus, while discussing thinking as
information processing in the brain, he wrote that the brain
does not secrete thought “as the liver does bile”, as
the earlier materialists claimed, nor does it put it out in
the form of energy, as the muscle puts out its activity.
Information is information, not matter or energy. No
materialism which does not admit this can survive at the
present day. (Wiener 1948)
According to Wiener’s metaphysics, matter-energy and
Shannon information are different physical phenomena, but
neither can exist without the other. So-called ‘physical
objects’ – including living organisms – are actually
persistent patterns of information in an ever-changing ‘flow’
or ‘flux’ of matter-energy. Every physical process is a
mixing and mingling of matter-energy with Shannon information
– a creative ‘coming-to-be’ and a destructive ‘fading away’ –
as old patterns of matter-energy and information fade and new
ones emerge.
Another aspect of Wiener’s metaphysics is his account of
human nature and personal identity. Human beings are,
according to Wiener, patterns of information persisting
through changes in matter-energy. In spite of continuous
exchanges of matter-energy in a person’s body, the complex
organization or form of the person – the pattern of
Shannon information encoded within– is maintained to preserve
life, functionality and personal identity. As Wiener
poetically said,
We are but whirlpools in a river of ever-flowing water.
We are not stuff that abides, but patterns that perpetuate
themselves. . . .
The individuality of the body is that of a
flame…of a form rather than of a bit of substance. (Wiener
1954)
To use today’s language, humans are ‘information objects’
whose personal identity is tied to information processing and
persisting patterns of information, rather than specific bits
of matter.
Support from today’s physics – Wiener’s metaphysics
anticipated recent developments in physics: According to the
so-called ‘theory of everything’, which has emerged from
physics during the past two decades, the universe is
fundamentally informational. Every so-called ‘object’ or
physical entity is, in reality, a persisting pattern of
Shannon information. This account of the nature of the
universe originated with Princeton physicist John Wheeler
(1990), and it has been refined and supported by many
scientific experiments during the past decade.
In recent years, an alternative metaphysical foundation
for Information Ethics has emerged from the work of Luciano
Floridi and his Information Ethics Research Group at Oxford.
They have developed an approach to ethics that places at the
center of ethics, not the actions, values, and
characters of human agents, but instead the evil (harm,
dissolution, destruction) suffered by the recipients of
action. By interpreting every existing entity in the
universe as an ‘informational object’, Floridi and his
colleagues are able to shift the ethical perspective from an
‘agent-based’ (and human-based) theory to a ‘patient-based’,
non-anthropocentric theory.
With this approach, every existing entity – humans, other
animals, plants, even non-living artifacts, electronic
objects in cyberspace, pieces of intellectual property – can
be interpreted as potential agents that act upon
(physically affect) other entities, as well as potential
patients that are acted upon by other entities.
Unlike Wiener’s metaphysical foundation for Information
Ethics, which is based upon Shannon-information and the laws
of physics, Floridi’s Information Ethics presupposes a
Spinozian metaphysics:
[Information Ethics] suggests that there is something
even more elemental than life, namely being – that
is, the existence and flourishing of all entities and their
global environment – and something more fundamental than
suffering, namely entropy. . . . [Information
Ethics] holds that being/information has an
intrinsic worthiness. It substantiates this position by
recognizing that any informational entity has a
Spinozian right to persist in its own status, and a
Constructionist right to flourish, i.e., to improve and
enrich its existence and essence. (Floridi 2006, p. 11)
|