Is IT Ethical? 2004 ETHICOMP Survey of Professional Practice

Prof. Simon Rogerson

Mary Prior

Originally published as ETHIcol in the IMIS Journal Volume 15 No 5 (September 2005)


In September the fourth bi-annual study into the attitudes of Information Systems (IS) professionals, 'Is IT Ethical? 2002 ETHICOMP Survey of Professional Practice' was launched at ETHICOMP 2005 in Sweden. A copy of the survey was sent to all IMIS members and was also made available on the IMIS website. The country profile of respondents reflects the Institution's strong presence in African countries such as Zambia and Kenya and its high proportion of student members.

The survey findings suggest a high level of ethical awareness among the IMIS members who responded, who overwhelmingly agree that ethical issues are important to organisations and to themselves as individuals, that they would not make unauthorised copies of software to use at work nor at home, and who would not use other employees' access codes without their permission to view data they are not authorised to see. However, the findings also highlight areas where more guidance and support for individuals is desirable to encourage consistently responsible behaviour.

Among the findings that will be of interest to employers is that respondents consider their organisation's computer-held data to be more secure from external than from internal sources. Taken with the finding that some respondents consider it acceptable to use other employees' access codes with their permission to access data they are not authorised to see, this provides a warning to organisations to review both the technical aspects of the security of their systems and also the human resource management issues.

Employers may also be interested to find that over the four surveys, a large proportion of respondents continue to consider it acceptable to use their organisation's computing facilities for their own non-profit-making activities providing this has 'no adverse affect' on their employer. This is the case despite the widespread existence of organisational policies covering facilities' use. Organisations may wish to ensure that employees are not only informed about policies but that they understand their relevance; for example what are the possible 'adverse affects' of unauthorised use. A regular review of policies and frequent reminders to employees may also be required.

A cause for concern is the finding that the minority of respondents who find it acceptable to cut down on testing effort if a project is significantly behind schedule or over budget is continuing to grow with each survey, reaching 22% in 2004. It is somewhat alarming to consider the consequences on software quality and the potential impact of such an attitude. Another worrying result is that the proportion of respondents who consider it acceptable for employers to use electronic surveillance to monitor employees' performance without either their knowledge or consent has risen to 20%.

The report contains recommendations for organisations, for professional societies and for educators that are intended to promote more socially responsible practices within the IS community.

It is recommended that professional societies representing the IS profession should:

It is recommended that the academic community responsible for the education of future IS professionals and for research into IS-related issues should:

For a copy of the survey report contact IMIS.

Please send your views on ethical and social responsibility issues and cases of ethical dilemmas to:


Professor Simon Rogerson
Director
Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility
Faculty of Computing Sciences and Engineering
De Montfort University
The Gateway
Leicester
LE1 9BH
Tel:(+44) 116 257 7475
Fax:(+44) 116 207 8159
Email:<srog@dmu.ac.uk>
Home Page:http://www.ccsr.cse.dmu.ac.uk